Definition: Then the glory of the LORD departed from off the threshold of the house, and stood over the cherubims.
Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this passage from Ezekiel 10:18. It's a really striking image with a lot of symbolism! Here’s what it means in simple terms: The Basic Idea: This verse describes a moment of intense, overwhelming holiness – almost like God is shutting himself off completely from the world. It’s a picture of divine power and protection. Let's unpack it piece by piece: “Then the glory of the LORD departed…” : This means that God was withdrawing His presence, His light, and His power from the house – which represents something sacred or important. Think of it like a spotlight being turned off. “…from off the threshold of the house…” : "Threshold" is a doorway or entrance. So, this is referring to the entrance of the house itself - a place of peace and connection with God. The glory is leaving this place. "...and stood over the cherubims." : This is where it gets really interesting! "Cherubs" are often depicted as divine beings – symbols of pure, radiant light and protection. The word “stood over” means to stand close or firmly . So, God was literally standing over these cherubs, creating a powerful, protective barrier. What does this all mean? This is often interpreted as a sign of: Divine Protection: It suggests that God is safeguarding something precious – perhaps a person, a place, or an idea. Restraining Evil: It could be a response to evil trying to enter into the world. The cherubs represent divine defense and keeping things in check. A Shift in Focus: It might signify a time when God is prioritizing something more important than earthly concerns. Important Note: The interpretation of this verse has varied throughout history, and it’s still debated by theologians today. It's a beautiful and symbolic image that encourages us to recognize the holiness and power of God. --- Would you like me to: Explain another Bible verse? Discuss the context of Ezekiel 10:18 in more detail? Explore different interpretations of this passage?